Satish Saran And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18288 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Satish Saran Son of late Audh Behari Saran, R/o Road No. 12, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Kadamkuan, Town and District- Patna.-800016. 2.

Md. Ashraf Son of Late Md. Rafique, Resident of 625/2 Haroon Nagar Colony, Phulwarisharif, P.S. Phulwarisharif, town and District Patna-801505 3.

Chanadra Shekhar Prasad Son of late Ram Sharan Prasad, Resident of Flat No. 103 M.E. Apartment, Ortho Dental Lane, near Vinshu Palace, East Boring Canal Road, P.S. S. K. Puri, town and District Patna-800001. 4.

Ashok Kumar S/o late Mathura Prasad, Resident of Flat No 6 MF/6/213 Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S. Agam Kua, town and District Patna, 800026.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Ministry of Cooperate Affairs, Union of India, New Delhi. 3.

Registrar of Companies, 2nd Floor, Corporate Bhawan, GSI Post, Tattiannran Nagoal, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad-500068.

4.

The Chairman, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. Resident of Parishram Bhawa, 3rd Floor, 5-9-58/B Basheerbagh, Hyderabad500004, Telengana. 5.

The President Indian Institute of Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors, (A Company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956), Resident of Flat No. 315 Paras Chambers, D.No.3-5-890, Himayat Nagar, Hydrabad-500029 (Telengana).

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Syed Qaisar Hasan, Advocate For the UOI :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma, Addl.S.G.

For the Res. No. 4 :

Mr.Raj Kamal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-08-2019 In view of the statements made on behalf of respondent no. 4 that the benevolent fund is no longer mandatory and the petitioner is not required to contribute towards the same, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CWJC No.18288 of 2017(2) dt.14-08-2019 2/2 in such circumstance he would have no grievance existing. Taking note of the above, the writ application is disposed off as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/ved U