Ram Nandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.646 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9819 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Nandan Singh , son of Late Shri Uma Shyam Narayan Singh , resident of Village - Hasanpur, P.O. Chakand, District - Gaya, Presently Working As Assistant ( Upper Divisional Clerk ), Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Bihar, Patna Namely S. Shiva Kumar Son Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner

2. The Veer Kunwar Singh University, Through The Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur, Namely Dr. Manoj Kumar Son Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner

3. The Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur, Namely Dr. Kumaresh Pd. Singh Son Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner

4. The Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur, Namely Dr. Manoj Kumar Son Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner

5. The Finance Officer, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur, Namely Arun Kumar Sinha Son Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner

6. Manzar Imam, Assistant, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur

7. Uday Shankar Ojha, Assistant, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur .... .... Respondents-Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents-Opposite Parties : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-01-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Sri Sarvadeo Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 to 7 / officials of Veer Kunwar Singh University, in presence of learned AC to SC -XI, submits that in view of the facts disclosed in the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 to 7, the order

Patna High Court MJC No.646 of 2013 (6) dt.05-01-2015 2/2 of the writ court has already been complied. He submits that in compliance with the order of the writ court case of petitioner was considered and final order has been passed vide Annexure - 'A' to the show cause i.e. order dated 1.3.2014.

In view of the fact that in compliance with the order of the writ court a reasoned order has already been passed by the Vice Chancellor i.e. Annexure - 'A' , the court is of the opinion that no contempt is made out.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with an indication that if petitioner feels aggrieved with the order of Vice Chancellor i.e. Annexure - 'A', he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U