Om Prakash v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4914 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19375 of 2010 ====================================================== Om Prakash Son of Late Shambhu Saran Prasad Resident Of VillageBharwalia, P.S.-Palanawa, District-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sri K.P. Ramaiya, the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
3. Sri Abhay Kumar Singh, The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah
4. Sri Vijay Mal Kumar, The Block Development Officer, Mainatand, District-West Champaran
5. Smt. Khusum Tara Devi, The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Laxmipur, Mainatand Block, District-West Champaran
6. Sri Umakant Prasad Yadav, The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Laxmipur, Mainatand Block, District-West Champaran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyavrat Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel AC to AAG-3 are present.
Learned A.A.G.-3 in compliance of the order under contempt produces Certificate of Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Marks Sheet of Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Certificate of Bihar School Examination Board, Marks Sheet of Bihar School Examination Board, College Leaving Certificate, School Leaving Certificate of Class-10, including the Disability
Patna High Court MJC No.4914 of 2013 (8) dt.09-02-2015 2/2 Certificate of the petitioner in duplicate in Court, which have been obtained from the concerned authorities.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is ready to receive all the above certificates of the petitioner in duplicate and also submits that regarding the Caste Certificate and Residential Certificate, he has already applied before the Circle Officer, Raxaul, Motihari.
In view of the above submissions, there is no need to keep the matter pending. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U