Mahesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15406 of 2012 ====================================================== Mahesh Ray S/O Suresh Ray Resident Of Village- Mirjapur, P.S- Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur, At Samastipur.

3. The District Education Officer, Samastipur, At Samastipur.

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur, At Samastipur.

5. The District Programme Officer, S.S.A. Samastipur At Samastipur.

6. The Block Education Officer, Patori Block, District- Samastipur.

7. The Block Education Officer, Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

8. The Head Master-Cum- Drawing And Disbursing Officer, Marked (Chinhit) Rajkiya Girl Middle School Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

9. The Headmaster-Cum- Drawing And Disbursing Officer, Marks (Chinhit), Middle School Hasanpur Surat, Block Patori, District- Samastipur.

10. The Head Master, Rajkiya Utkaramit Mahya Vidyalaya Usraha, Block Patori, District- Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha A.C .to G.A-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is decision of the respondents whereby instead of adjusting the alleged excess amount from the joint signatory only the respondents have considered and fixed the accountability against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to letter dated 12.09.2010 submits that the respondents are required to adjust the excess amount not from the petitioner alone but the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15406 of 2012(2) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 other joint signatory.

In view of the letter contained in Annexure- 9 the writ petitioner is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Serv Sikchha Avian, Samastipur at Samastipur by filing representation along with a copy of this order within a month and the respondent District Programme Officer is required to take fresh decision after hearing the petitioner as well as the others joint signatory and pass appropriate order with regard to the liability of the petitioner in the light of Annexure-9 within a maximum period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J.) Rajiv/- U