← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/632/2013disposed

Prof. Dr. Anant Kumar Thakur v. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh And ORS.

2015-03-09Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.632 of 2013 dt.09-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.632 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14089 of 2012 =========================================================== PROF. DR. ANANT KUMAR THAKUR, S/O LATE JAGARNATH THAKUR, R/O MOHALLA - SUBHASH PALLI, KISHANGANJ, P.O. AND P.S. KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT - KISHANGANJ, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, MARWARI COLLEGE, KISHANGANJ, P.O.

AND P.S.

KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT - KISHANGANJ.

.... .... PETITIONER.

VERSUS

1. DR. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS PRINCIPAL MARWARI COLLEGE, KISHANGANJ, P.O. AND P.S. KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT - KISHANGANJ.

2. DR. ARUN KUMAR JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS THE FINANCE OFFICER, BUPENDRA NARAIN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHUBANI.

3. SRI GANESH PRASAD YADAV, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS THE REGISTRAR, BHUPENDRA NARAIN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA.

4. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH AMARJEET SINHA PRESENTLY POSTED AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.

.... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : MR. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR MANGLAM, ADV. MRS. ANITA KUMARI, ADVOCATE.

For the State/s : MR. BINAY KR. PANDEY, AC TO GA-3 For the O.P. No. 1 MR. RANA USGWAR CGABDRAM, ADVOCATE. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-03-2015 In presence of the learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 18.09.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14089 of 2012 has already been complied by the concerned

Patna High Court MJC No.632 of 2013 dt.09-03-2015 opposite parties.

Since the order, under contempt, has been complied by the opposite parties, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U