Krishna Yadav @ Nanhak v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26772 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2018 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Krishna Yadav @ Nanhak, Son of Late Lagan Yadav Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, Mathiya Tola, P.S.- Rani Talab, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Parashuram Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case no. 300 of 2018, registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is that complainant/informant Chandrama Singh Yadav performed marriage of his daughter with Chandan Kumar @ Sunil in the year 2006. Thereafter, they were blessed with two child. Subsequently, all the in-laws started demanding 10 Katha of land after birth of female child, namely, Saumya Kumari and due to non-fulfillment of the demand, daughter of the complainant/informant was being tortured. On 23.10.2018, informant received information that his daughter has committed suicide. Thereafter, informant went
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26772 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/3 to matrimonial house of his daughter and saw his daughter dead lying on the ground. Thereafter, inquest report was prepared by the Police in the Hospital, one application was also given on which basis U.D. Case No. 2 of 2018 was registered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, admittedly, daughter of the complainant/informant died after 12 years of her marriage and accusation is of further demand of 10 katha of land after birth of female child is totally false. Further submission is that mother-in-law and brother-in-law against whom there is specific allegation of quarrel with the daughter of complainant/informant have already been allowed privilege of pre-arrest bail on 19.02.2019 and 05.04.2019 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 9540 of 2019 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4846 of 2019, respectively, by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.1st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 300
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26772 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 3/3 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T