Bhola Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32092 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2022 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
BHOLA RAI Son of Ram Dayal Rai Resident of Village - Tarahrasia, P.S.- Ganga Bride, District - Vaishali.
2.
Ram Dayal Rai Son of Late Bechu Rai Resident of Village - Tarahrasia, P.S.- Ganga Bride, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 of the IPC.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32092 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2 petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The specific overt act is against other co-accused persons. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No.298 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T