Laxuman Rai @ Laxman Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39230 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2021 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== LAXUMAN RAI @ LAXMAN RAI Son of Ramsundar Ray Resident of Village - Pashchim Rauza, P.S.- Chapra Town, District - Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Submission is that only material against the petitioner is report of the informer to the police. There is no direct evidence against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39230 of 2021(2) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bheldi Police Station Case No. 148 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T