Girendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39262 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2020 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

GIRENDRA SINGH Son of Late Ramdip Singh Resident of Village - Baseta, P.S.- Imamganj, District - Gaya.

2.

Ram Ashish Singh @ Ashish Singh Son of Late Ramdip Singh Resident of Village - Baseta, P.S.- Imamganj, District - Gaya 3.

Mahendra Singh Son of Late Ramdip Singh Resident of Village - Baseta, P.S.- Imamganj, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the State :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP For the informant :

Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 448, 379, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 assaulted Gaya Singh by means of bricks, due to which he sustained head injury and petitioner No.3 and two co-accused assaulted Rupa Devi, due to which she sustained head injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39262 of 2021(2) dt.11-04-2022 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is a case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place. The injuries on the side of the accused persons have not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S. case No.191/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T