Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27666 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2023 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== SURAJ KUMAR S/o- Sunil Kumar Singh Village- Vishvammarpur Chintamanganj Ps- Garkha Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Pratima Kumari W/o- Suraj Kumar, D/o- Hari Madhav Prasad Singh Village- Vishvammarpur Chintamanganj Ps- Garkha Dist- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brajesh Sahay, Adv.
Ms.Harshita, Adv.
Mrs.Rupa Sinha, Adv.
Ms.Arif Daula Siddiquie, Adv.
Mrs.Vandna Rani, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP For the Opp. Party No. 2 :
Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the opposite party no.2 and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 453 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 313, 498(A), 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 D.P. Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that now they are ready to settle the dispute.
4. Without going into the merits of the matter, petitioner is granted provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27666 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/3 event or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Chapra, Saran in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 453 of 2023.
5. The concerned Court is directed to make suitable efforts for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.
6. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.
7. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.
8. If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the learned trial court, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.
9. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27666 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 3/3