Sonelal Yadav @ Sonu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28927 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Sonelal Yadav @ Sonu Yadav S/o Ashok Yadav @ Brahmdeo Yadav R/o Vill.- Mahinathpur, Barmotra, Ward No.- 6, P.S.- Raghopur, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the F.I.R., police recovered one pistol loaded with four live cartridges from the petitioner as also one live cartridge from his pocket.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28927 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 ammunitions. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2024 and has sixteen criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and charge has also been framed. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28927 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(IV) Petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below without taking its prior permission. If petitioner violates any condition/s, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T