Girja Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33898 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2017 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ======================================================

1. Girja Devi, W/o Opendra Sah @ Khakhu Sah,

2. Shikha Devi W/o Mukesh Sah,

3. Mukesh Sah S/o Opendra Sah @ Khakhu Sah, All are R/o Vill.- Shital Bhakurahar, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sarai P.S. case no. 168 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304 B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law, sister-in- law and brother -in- law of the deceased. They have no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33898 of 2018(3) dt.26-07-2018 2/2 petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sarai P.S. case no. 168 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T