← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32824/2018bail granted

Ganesh Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32824 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -138 Year- 2017 Thana -NALANDA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Ganesh Chauhan, S/o Kailash Zamadar @ Kailash Chauhan, R/o Vill.- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Ben, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Nalanda P.S. Case No.138 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 307 and other allied sections of Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting Satish Singh by means of sword causing injury in his hand. Case diary has been received. There is no injury report of Satish Singh available in the case diary. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32824 of 2018 (3) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 No.138 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T