Patna High CourtCWJC/4296/2015dismissed

Baranjit Kumar @ Brahmchari Ranjit Kumar @ Br. Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-24Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4296 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Baranjit Kumar @ Brahmchari Ranjit Kumar @ Br. Ranjit Kumar S/o - Jogendra Bhuiyan resident of village- Maheshpur, Post- Mananpur, Police Station - Chanan District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Primary Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai

4. The District Education Officer, cum District programme Co-ordinator, Bihar Education Project, Lakhisarai.

5. The District Programme Officer, Primary Education Bihar Education project, Lakhisarai.

6. The Block Education Extension officer, Chanan Block , District- Lakhisarai.

7. The Secretary, Vidyalaya Siksha Samiti Primary School Maheshpur, DistrictLakhisarai.

8. The Chairman, Block Co-ordinatior, Chanan-Block, District- Lakhisarai.

9. The Headmaster primary School, Maheshpur, Tola - Mushhari, Maheshpur,

10. Sanoj Kumar S/o - Rajendra Ravidas , resident of village- Maheshpur, Das Tola , Post- Mananpur, P.S. - Chanan, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Respondent/s: Mr. AVINASH KUMAR, SC 30 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-03-2015 A K Tripathi, J.

Writ application is dismissed for the reason that it is not maintainable against non-selection or removal as Tola Sevak.

2. Petitioner has a remedy. Let him exhaust the same, basically in view of the fact that said post is not a post under the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4296 of 2015 dt.24-03-2015 2 / 2

3. If any emolument of the petitioner is required to be paid for the period of work, petitioner has freedom to assert his claim, which will be looked into and paid and if not, reason thereof will be communicated to the petitioner within a period of three months.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U