← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62068/2017bail granted

Rajdeep Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-19Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62068 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Rajdeep Singh, S/o Umesh Singh,

2. Upendra Singh S/o Jawahar Singh, Both R/o Village- Khulhariya, P.S.- Buxar (Muffasil), District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the IPC, 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution story, in brief, is that 345.6 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 345.6 liters wine is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62068 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 recovered from the vehicle in question. The name of the petitioners has come on the basis of disclosure made by the local Chaukidar due to village politics. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-II-cumSpecial Judge (Excise), Buxar, in connection with Buxar (Ind) P.S. Case No. 184 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T