Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7747 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Son of Ramsagar Prasad, resident of Ward No. 13, P.S. Raghunathpur, District East Champaran.

2.

Virendrra Singh, Son of Shyam Sundar Singh, resident of Village - Maujepakadiya, Ward No. 7, Harsiddhi, P.S. Harsiddhi, District East Champaran.

3.

Ashok Kumar Singh, Son of Nand Kishor Singh, resident of Village Matha Banwari, P.O.- Bathana, P.S. Piprakothi, District East Champaran. 4.

Vivek Kumar Singh, Son of Hareshwar Singh, resident of Village English, Nawadih, P.S. Nawadih, District East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar at Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar at Patna.

3.

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation through its Managing Director, Bihar at Patna.

4.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Bihar at Patna.

5.

The District Transport Committee Chairman-cum-District Collector, East Champaran, District East Champaran.

6.

The District Manager, B.S.F.C., Motihari, District East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the BSFC : Mr. Siddharth Harsh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7747 of 2020(5) dt.12-03-2021 2/2

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh states that this writ petition has now become infructuous and need not be pursued any longer.

3. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the application accordingly stands disposed of.

4. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U