Jiyalal Prasad And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44140 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2014 Thana -GHORASAHAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Jiyalal Prasad son of Late Hari Chandra Prasad

2. Rajendra Prasad Yadav son of Late Hari Chandra Prasad

3. Suresh Prasad Yadav son of Late Hari Chandra Prasad All are resident of Village- Dudhwa, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran.

4. Mahendra Bhagat son of Devraj Bhagat Resident of Village- Masahi, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran.

5. Raman Rai son of Late Gorakh Rai Resident of Village- Pokhariya, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran.

6. Nagendra Prasad Srivastava son of Late Hari Shankar Prasad Resident of village- Bagahi Bhelwa, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Randhir Kumar son of Jai Mangal Prasad resident of Village- Dhudhua, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 620 of 2014 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that this is a case of purely civil in nature. It is also submitted that it would appear from Annextures A and B to the supplementary affidavit that after investigation, the Police has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44140 of 2016 (4) dt.23-06-2017 2/2 found the case false against the petitioners and final form has been submitted against the petitioners and thereafter, the informant filed the protest petition before the trial Court.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sukrahna at Dhaka in connection with Complaint Case No. 60 pf 2014 Tr. No. 7283 of 2015 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T