Sri Muneshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19927 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Sri Muneshwar Ram, Son of Late Anandi Ram, Residence of village Bala- Bakhar, Police Station- Phulparas, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar

2. The District Collector cum Chairman, Human Resources Department, District- Madhubani

3. The District Education Officer cum Bihar Education Project Officer of District Madhubani

4. The Block Development Officer, Block- Phulparass, DistrictMadhubani

5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Gehua Bairiya, Block- Phulprass, District Madhubani

6. Panchayat Sacheev, Gram Panchayat Raj, Gehua Bairia, BlockPhulprass, District- Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, AAG-11 Mrs. Shilpi Kumari, AC to AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 17-12-2015 Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned Additional Advocate General-11, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Since this application under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to service matter in the sense that this petition puts to

Patna High Court CWJC No.19927 of 2014 (2) dt.17-12-2015 2/2 challenge the appointment of teachers, we are clearly of the view that this application is misconceived and cannot, therefore, be sustained.

Situated thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U