← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/429/2013dismissed

Dr. Neelam Koomar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-05-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.429 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8119 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr. Neelam Koomar, S/O Late Braj Nandan Prasad, R/O Mohalla - Kharmanchak, D.N. Singh Road, Police Station-Kotwali, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The State of Bihar through Shri Amarjit Sinha, Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna

3. Dr. Bimal Kumar, the Acting Vice-Chancellor, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

4. Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, the Registrar, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

5. Mr. Ashutosh Prasad, the Finance Officer, T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

6. The Principal, Sabour College, Sabour, Bhagalpur .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : MR. AJAY MUKHERJEE, ADV. For the Respondent/s : MR. MANOJ KR. AMBASTA, G.P.-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been informed that he belongs to R2 category and from the cut off date onward, he is not entitled to the salary. He further submits that for the earlier period he must be paid his arrear according to U.G.C. pay scale.

Respondents have controverted the submission of the petitioner and submits that as the petitioner belongs to R2 category he is not entitled to any arrear, so much so, the issue with respect

Patna High Court MJC No.429 of 2013 (7) dt.05-05-2015 2/2 to entitlement of employees falling in R2 category is under consideration before Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha Commission. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to proceed with the matter any further. This contempt application is dismissed.

The petitioner is at liberty to approach the University. (Shivaji Pandey, J.) Vats/- U