Patna High CourtCWJC/802/2015dismissed

Sapana Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-25Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.802 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Sapana Kumari Wife of Sanjay Kumar Choudhary Resident of VillageBhalgama Ward no.2, Ajanaul Gram Panchyat, Police StationDalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur.

2. Kumari Indu Wife of Nagendra Sharma Resident of Village- Bulakipur Ward no.11, Gram Panchyat Bulakipur, Police Station- Dalsingh Sarai, District- Samastipur.

3. Lalita Kumari Wife of Naresh Ram Resident of Village- Malpur Ward no.5, Gram Panchyat Malpur, Purwaripatti, Police Station- DalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar.

2. Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Pant Bhawan, Patna, Bihar

3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

4. District Development Commissioner, Samastipur,

5. The District Programme Officer, Collectoriate, Samastipur

6. Child Development Program Officer (CDPO), Block- DalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur

7. The Muhkiya , Gram Panchyat Raj Ajnaul, Block -DalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur

8. The Muhkiya , Gram Panchyati Raj Bulakipur, Block -DalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur

9. The Muhkiya , Gram Panchyati Raj Malpur Purwari Patti, Block - DalsinghSarai, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Choudhary Shyam Nandan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nirbhay K.Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-01-2017 Sri Choudhary Shyam Nandan , learned counsel for the petitioners, in presence of learned State Counsel submits that

Patna High Court CWJC No.802 of 2015 (2) dt.25-01-2017 2/2 during pendency of the present writ petition relief which was sought in the writ petition has already been granted to the petitioners. Accordingly, it has become infructuous. The writ petition stands dismissed as same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U