Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37059 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar, Son of Late Mohan Mandal, Resident of Village - Simraha, Police Station - Saharsa, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.243 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 354(B), 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

The step-sister of the petitioner has made a complaint against the petitioner that the land, which was given by her father, has wrongly been mutated by the petitioner, thereby created forged and fabricated document.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that basically it is a civil dispute, let the petitioner, Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37059 of 2018(2) dt.03-07-2018 2/2 anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case no.243 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T