Kumar Navneet Himanshu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (DB) No.893 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2003 Thana -MOKAMAH District- PATNA ====================================================== Kumar Navneet Himanshu , Son of Late Keshar Das, Resident of Village and Post- Mor, P.S. Mokamah, District- Patna. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Dhirendra Paswan, Son of Sri Surendra Das, resident of Village- Bichili Malahi, P.S.- Barh, District -Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Akashdeep For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Shashi Bala Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 07-07-2017 Sri Akashdeep, learned counsel for the appellant, in presence of Smt. Shashi Bala Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Himanshu Kumar Akela, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 again requests for granting time for filing petition for leave. He submits that petition for leave has already been prepared.

Considering the fact that earlier there was specific direction to file the same and same has not been filed and we

Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.893 of 2016 (7) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 are not entertaining any Appeal against acquittal in absence of leave petition, the prayer is refused.

The Appeal stands dismissed in absence of petition for grant of leave under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Praful/- U T