Ravi Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32223 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== RAVI RANJAN Son of Sri Janardan Prasad Resident of Village - Eastern Ram Krishna Nagar, P.S.- Ram Krishna Nagar, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Raju Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Son of Sri Arjun Singh Resident of Mohalla - Khazanchi Road, P.S.- Pirbahore, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2020 This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no. 2 by learned Additional Sessions Judge -XVII, Patna, vide order dated 31.03.2019 passed in B.P. No. 367 of 2019 in connection with Complaint Case No. 715(C) of 2017.
Grounds taken by the petitioner for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner is that learned Additional Sessions Judge has illegally passed the order granting bail to opposite party no. 2 without considering the materials available on record.
Heard learned A.P.P. and perused the impugned order, from which, it appears that the learned Additional Sessions
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32223 of 2019(6) dt.26-02-2020 2/2 Judge after considering the fact that the petitioner had dispute with co-accused Shanker Prasad and amount was paid to him and even the cheque in favour of the petitioner was also issued by the said Shanker Prasad, enlarged the petitioner on bail. Further there is no allegation against the petitioner of misuse of privilege of bail, tampering with the evidence or any chance of absconding of opposite party no. 2 in this case. In view of the discussions made above, I find no merit in this application, same is, accordingly, dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T