Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36870 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2023 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Sanjeet Kumar Son Of Jaynandan Prasad @ Jayanand Prasad Resident Of Village - Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya 2.

Ranjeet Kumar Son Of Jaynandan Prasad @ Jayanand Prasad Resident Of Village - Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya 3.

Ranju Kumari Daughter Of Jaynandan Prasad @ Jayanand Prasad Resident Of Village - Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya 4.

Jaynandan Prasad @ Jayanand Prasad Son Of Late Ramavtar Prasad Resident Of Village - Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya 5.

Surendra Prasad @ Surendra Kumar Son Of Shatrudhan Prasad Resident Of Village - Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya 6.

Sudhan Prasad @ Sudhan Kumar Son Of Uday Prasad @ Uday Mahto Resident Of Village - Aurawan, P.S. - Magadh Medical, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 308, 325, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged the on 26.11.2023 when she was ploughing the field with a tractor to plant wheat crop, at the same time all the named accused persons came there and started assaulting her and her family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36870 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that the injury was found simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that injury was found simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.386 of 2023 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T