Gaurab Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38175 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2018 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Gaurab Yadav, S/o Atal Yadav @ Athal Yadav, Resident of VillageChukti, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mansi P.S. Case No. 26 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 379, 337 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is specific allegation against co-accused Rikesh Yadav of assaulting the informant, her husband and her daughter. It has further been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 26 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38175 of 2018 (2) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T