Sita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38406 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -376 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Sita Devi .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 376 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant with intention to marry her. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the statement of the victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr. P. C. in which she has stated that she has already married with the petitioner and wants to live with him and she is aged about 21 years.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38406 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 376 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T