Ainul Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29026 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2020 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== AINUL ANSARI S/o Late Hatim Ansari Resident of Mohalla-Langar Toli Chouraha, P.S.-Kadamkuan, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Ataul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 15/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, petitioner executed a sale-deed on 19.12.2017 in favour of informant in respect of the property which was mortgaged with L.I.C. H.F.L. as a result, some officials of the L.I.C. of India, who is mortgagee, pasted the notice on the wall of the house of the informant, in the name of the petitioner who took a loan of Rs. 15,93,190.58 from L.I.C.H.F.L. in the year 2016.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a government servant of the State of Bihar and due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29026 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2020 2/2 to suspension for certain period, he could not deposit the E.M.I. It is further submitted that up till now about 10 lakhs has already been deposited by the petitioner.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the bail application and submits that there is allegation against the petitioner that he executed the sale-deed in respect of the property which has been mortgaged with the L.I.C.H.F.L. as such, he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioner, It is, accordingly, rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Saif/- U T