Patna High CourtC. REV./377/2013dismissed

Ram Ratan Kumar And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-23Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.377 of 2013 Arising out of LPA No. 1654 of 2010 ===========================================================

1. Ram Ratan Kumar, son of late Vedanand Kumar, resident of village-Telghee, P.S.-Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

2. Md. Nisharual Haque, son of late Tuntun Nadaf, resident of village-Narkatia, P.S.-Kharik, District-Bhagalpur.

3. Pravin Kumar, son of late Jagdeo Prasad Mandal, resident of village-Dhol Bajja, P.S.-Dhol Bajja, District-Bhagalpur.

4. Alij Devi, wife of Vidyakar Jha, resident of village-Nagarh, P.S.-Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur.

.... .... Respondents/Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman of District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Bhagalpur.

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Bhagalpur.

5. Prabhakar Kumar Gupta, S/o late Jitendra Das, R/o Gonoul P.S.-Sultanganj, Dist.-Bhagalpur.

.... .... Appellants/Respondents/Opposite Parties. =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to GP-24 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) Date: 23-11-2016

Patna High Court C. REV. No.377 of 2013 dt.23-11-2016 2/2 The petitioners seek review of the order dated 14th August, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 1654 of 2010 relying upon the order passed by the Supreme Court in Vishwanath Pandey vs. State of Bihar and others [(2013) 10 SCC 545].

The judgment in Vishwanath Pandey's case (supra) was not referred to at the time of hearing of the Letters Patent Appeal. Therefore, we do not find that the petitioners can be permitted to rely upon such judgment in a review petition.

Consequently, the Review Petition is dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Sanjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 30.11.2016 Transmission Date N.A.