Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29018 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ajay Kumar S/o- Mahes Singh Village- Khajuriya Ps- Sidhwaliya DistGopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner was arrested by the police along with a stolen motorcycle and on demand of papers, he failed to produce any valid documents for the same.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29018 of 2025(4) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. The alleged motorcycle which was recovered from the possession of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the seizure list. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been arrested only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28207 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29018 of 2025(4) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T