Bhola Prajapati @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3443 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2017 Thana -AKHODHIGOLA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Bhola Prajapati @ Vijay Kumar S/o Sri Surendra Prajapati, Resident of Village-Banka P.S.-Akorhigola, District-Rohtas. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rameshwar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Akorhigola Police Station Case No.66 of 2017 registered under Sections 452/354A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i) (r)(w)(ii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The F.I.R. does not disclose that any offence under the SC/ST Act is made out. Hence, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3443 of 2017 (3) dt.04-01-2018 P2/ released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T