Aunindra Kumar @ Rocky v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29341 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-827 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Aunindra Kumar @ Rocky Son of Sheshnath Prasad Resident of VillageChhawahi Khas, P.S. -Manjhagarh, District -Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Satya Kirti, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Kumar Satya Kirti appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 827 of 2025 dated 09.11.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 132, 109, 125, 324(5) and 326(g) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, while the Informant was proceeding to park his police vehicle after duty, he saw a Scorpio vehicle collided with a Thelawala and an Apache motorcycle and flee from the spot. Thereafter, a crowd allegedly gathered, blamed and assaulted the Informant, damaged the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29341 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 2/3 police vehicle by pelting stones and set it ablaze.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. Counsel for the petitioner next submits that altogether 39 persons have been named in the F.I.R. while 50-70 unknown persons have been found to be implicated in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that merely on the basis of presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence which is said to have been noticed in the CCTV footage while there is no overt act or participation or instigation have been attributed to him. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14258 of 2026 and another analogous case. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has four antecedents out of which in three of them, he is on bail.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is nothing specific against the petitioner and that there is no allegation of instigation against him, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29341 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 3/3 bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 827 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.
(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T