Sri Krishna Prasad Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6477 of 2013 ====================================================== Sri Krishna Prasad Srivastava, Son of Late Bhuwaneshwari Prasad Resident of Village and P.O.- Pirauta, Police Station- Muffasil Ara, DistrictBhojpur. at present retired teacher Primary School Basantpur, Ara, DistrictBhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sri Amarjeet Sinha, Commissioner Cum Secretary, Primary Education To Govt., Bihar, Patna
3. Sri Chitranjan Singh, Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna
4. Sri Susheel Shrivastava, Regional Deputy Director, Primary Education, Patna Division, Patna
5. Sri Satyendra Pd. Singh District Superintendent of Education, Bhojpur at Ara
6. Sri Raghubansh Kumar, District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara
7. Sri Binod Kumar, Block Education Extension Officer, Ara Muffasil
8. Sri Suman Sharma, Regional Education Extension Officer, Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Diwakar Prasad Sinha, Advocate.
For the O.P/s :
Mr. GP 19.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 01-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Having regard to the fact that the opposite parties have already made the final gradation list in terms of the direction given by this Court in the case of Ram Nath Singh & Ors. v. the State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2009(3) PLJR 384 and thereafter had also considered the case of the petitioner for grant of B.A. Trained Pay Scale, but have found him ineligible on account of pendency of the departmental proceeding as well as criminal case for which he was also placed under suspension by an
Patna High Court MJC No.6477 of 2013 (3) dt.01-05-2015 2/2 order dated 27.01.2011on the ground of embezzlement of Rs. 10,60,000/-, this Court does not find any reason now to continue with this contempt application because in the order in the connected writ petition, the direction of this Court was confined only to ensure preparation of gradation list and consider the case of the petitioner for promotion in the B.A. Trained pay scale and that has been already done.
3. That being so, this contempt application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U