Vinod Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5044 of 2012 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Son Of Shri Meghnath Roy Resident Of At Zilkabad Muthiya, P.O. and P.S.-Zilkabad, District-Saran Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through its Secretary, Home Affairs, Government of India.

2.

The Director General, Crpf, Cco Complex, Block No.-1 Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003, Lodhi Road New Delhi 3.

The Regional Director Crs Staff Selection Commissions 8-Ab, Bailey Road, Allahabad-211002, Uttar Pradesh 4.

Dr. Mrinal Hazarika Chief Medical Officer Border Security Force 5.

Dr. S.K. Parinal Opthal Molod I.S.I. Cmo Sc Comdt, C.R.P.F. C.H. Neemuch 6.

The Inspector General Personnel Director General Crpf, Block No.-1 Cco Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003 7.

The D.I.G. Administration Director General Crpf Cco. Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003 Null Null 8.

The Dig Recruitment Crpf, Cco Complex, Block No.-1 Lodhi Road, New Delhi 9.

The Inspector General, Bihar Sector Crpf, Patna 10.

The D.I.G. Law Dte, General C.R.P.F., New Delhi W.R.T. Their Sig No.-J.Ii. 1106/2011-L.W.P-Vi 11.

The D.I.G. Medical Composite Hospital, Crpf, Jharoda Kalan New Delhi W.R.T. D.I.R. Law Dte Gener 12.

Mr. K.C. Ahlawat, Dy. Commandant Legal O/O Igp, B/S/ Crpf, Patna, Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate For the UOI :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the UOI.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it seems that the present application has become infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5044 of 2012(7) dt.29-01-2024 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.

4. Prayer is allowed.

5. Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U