← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3756/2015dismissed

Dhiraj Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-24Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3756 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Dhiraj Kumar son of late Naresh Kumar Samaiyar resident of Village - kamruddin Ganj, + P.S. - Biharsharif, District- Nalanda.

2. Jay Bardhan son of Late Anand Prakash , resident of Village + Post- Sonchari , P.S. Parwalpur, District- Nalanda.

3. Arvind Kumar son of late Devendra Prasad Singh resident of Village + Post Utrarnawan , P.S. Rahui, District Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary , Department of Finance , Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Special Secretary, Finance Department , Bihar , Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary , Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Special Secretary , Department of Revenue and Land Reforms , Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Magistrate , Nalanda at Biharsharif. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajey Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. VERMA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-04-2015 *************** 24.04.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Chalk and cheese cannot be equated. It is an old saying in English. But if it is adopted in real parlance, in given facts, it will be evident from the pleading of the petitioners that they may be cheese or they may be chalk, but they are not equal. Petitioners are Clerk, working in the Muffassil, but would like a direction for consideration of appointment in the limited competitive examination, which is being held for Circle Inspectors of the Revenue Department.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3756 of 2015 dt.24-04-2015 2/2 The two cadres are different. The service conditions are different. There are two separate rules which govern them. If this be so, then every benefit is not meant for everybody, merely because he happened to be a government servant.

Writ application, therefore, is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U