Dilip Kumar Das @ Dilip Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7316 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2019 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== DILIP KUMAR DAS @ DILIP RAVIDAS Son of Sakhi Chandra Ravidas Resident of Village- Simal Gachi, P.S.- Muffasil, Rawi Pathara, DistrictPurnea (Bihar)- 854337. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-06-2021 . In view of sadden surge of COVID - 19 infection there is limited functioning of the High Court and therefore the matter has been listed for consideration through virtual mode. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

This Court would expect that the petitioner's Counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is called upon to do so by the office.

Petitioner seeks bail in Birpur PS Case No. 253 of 2019 registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC. There is alleged theft of articles from the house of the informant in his absence while he had gone to native village. It is submitted by petitioner's counsel that FIR is against unknown persons. Bases on his antecedent in two earlier cases and suspicion arising thereof he has been implicated in this case. He is in custody since 27.11.2019. Neither there is any recovery from the petitioner nor any material has been recovered on the basis of any statement made by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7316 of 2021(2) dt.25-06-2021 2/2 Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions as also the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Supaul in Birpur PS Case No. 253 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T