Bahzad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30243 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2017 Thana- MATIYARIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Bahzad Ansari R/O Village- Daraul, P.S.- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran 2.
Abdullah Ansari Son Of Bahzad Ansari R/O Village- Daraul, P.S.- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran 3.
Aliullah Ansari Son Of Bahzad Ansari R/O Village- Daraul, P.S.- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran 4.
Sakrul Ansari @ Md. Sakur Son Of Munaf Ansari R/O Village- Daraul, P.S.- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant with fists and slaps.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30243 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is land dispute between the parties. He submits that after investigation the police has submitted final form against the petitioners, but the learned Court below differed the final form and took cognizance against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Matiariy P.S. Case No.12 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T