Umarawati Devi @ Ramawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56211 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2014 Thana -PAKRIDAYAL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Umarawati Devi @ Ramawati Devi, wife of Raj Kishore Rai, Resident of Village-Kuawa, P.S.-Pakaridayal, Dist.-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 93 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he snatched golden chain and Rs.10,000/- from the wife of the informant.
It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56211 of 2017 (2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 93 of 2014, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T