Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30127 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== MANOJ YADAV Son of Dineshwar Yadav @ Dineshwar Singh Resident of Village - Koel, P.S.- Charpokhari, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that in 2012, she married her two daughters with sons of Krishna Yadav namely Rajesh and Jayram, further after marriage Jayram along with his family members used to assault her daughter Poonam, it is next alleged that on 13.04.2022, her second daughter informed that Jayram along with his father and brother have shot Punam dead, next alleges that ex-mukhiya and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30127 of 2023(2) dt.26-07-2023 2/3 his son (petitioner) are pressurising her not to disclose the correct fact about the occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that the allegation is against Jayram and his family members who are alleged to have committed the occurrence, as disclosed by the second daughter of the informant, and the petitioner has been falsely implicated alleging that he was pressurizing the informant along with his father not to disclose the correct status of the occurrence. It is further submitted that petitioner is not alleged to have committed the occurrence nor is alleged to have participated in the occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30127 of 2023(2) dt.26-07-2023 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 67 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T