Anil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28858 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-681 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Anil Chaudhary Son of Late Ram Prasad Chaudhary Resident Of Village -Gondapur Ps- Nawada District -Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nawada (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 681 of 2021 dated 01.07.2021 registered for the offences punishable under sections 33, 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the husband of the informant died due to consumption of spurious liquor. It is further alleged that he had purchased the said liquor from some unknown person.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28858 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 2/3 this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Manti Devi and Arvind Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The co-accused person has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 25.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50579 of 2024. The petitioner has 13 criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 04.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Nawada(Nagar) P.S. Case No. 681 of 2021, with a condition:- (i) That the petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28858 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T