← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/25/2017dismissed

Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2014 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== Usha Devi Wife of Late Dangal Yadav, Resident of Village- Dehra, Police Station- Chandi, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director- General of Police Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate Nalanda, District Nalanda. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, District Nalanda. 5.

The Thana In Charge Harnaut Telmar Police Station Harnaut Telmar, District Nalanda.

6.

Shailendra Yadav @ Gyanandra Yadav, S/o Late Akhilesh Yadav. 7.

Bhutali Yadav, Son of Awadhesh Yadav, 8.

Bhishyadav, Son of Akhlesh Yadav.

9.

Sula Yadav, Son of Awadhesh Yadav, 10.

Jogi Yadav @ Dagi Yadav, Son of Jalindra Yadav. 11.

Dilip Yadav, Son of Kapilyadav.

12.

Pintu Lal Yadav, Son of Late Rajeshwar Yadav. 13.

Bhonu Yadav, Son of Awadhesh Yadav.

14.

Baija Yadav, Son of Shailendra Yadav, 15.

Akashranjan @ Pintu Yadav, Son of Rajeshwar Singh Yadav. 16.

Ajay Yadav @ Dilip Yadav Son of Kapil Yadav 17.

Santosh Yadav, Son of Kapil Yadav.

18.

Sanjay Yadav, Son of Kapil Yadav 19.

Vijay Yadav, Son of Kapil Yadav, The Respondent nos 6 to 20 are resident of Village- Dehra Police Station Chandi, District- Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, AC to SC-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.25 of 2017(5) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 Mr. Anil Kumar, learned AC to SC-8 submits that in this case after completion of investigation the trial is going on. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this application has become infructuous. It is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.