← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8837/2019allowed

Vinod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-11Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8837 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinod Paswan S/o Sone Lal Paswan Resident of Village-Palkhi Gajpatti @ Pilkhi Gajpatti, P.S. Sakra, Dist.-Muzaffarpur,Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3.

The Excise Commissioner, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department Govt. of Bihar,Patna 4.

The District Transport Officer, Muzaffarpur 5.

The District Magistrate-cum-collector, Muzaffarpur 6.

The Superintendent of Excise, Muzaffarpur 7.

The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur 8.

The Officer-in-Charge, Sakra Police Station,Muzaffarpur 9.

The Excise Inspector, Chhata Chowk,Muzaffarpur,Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar (Sc11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 11-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner prays for provisional release of his Maruti Ciaz Delta bearing registration No. BR06BQ5855, Chassis No. MA3EXMG1S00340571 and Engine No. K14BN7208708 which has been seized in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 123 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of

Patna High Court CWJC No.8837 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 2/3 the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that merely because the car of the petitioner was following a pick-up van on which liquor was loaded, on suspicion, his car has been seized. Nothing has been recovered from the said vehicle. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the legal positions settled by this Court in the case of Diwakar Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department & Ors. reported in 2018 (3) PLJR 403, we direct for release of the vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner within a week on furnishing/production of the document showing the ownership of the vehicle and registration certificate in the name of the petitioner supporting the claim of the petitioner before the designated court below because neither the F.I.R. nor the seizure list reflects any reason for proceeding to be continued against the vehicle in question.

Since nothing has been recovered from the vehicle, there is no question of submission of any surety bond in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8837 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 3/3 With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sushma/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 22.7.19 Transmission Date NA