Veena Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30405 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2021 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Veena Devi Son Of Late Sikandar Mehta Resident Of Village- Fulot , Ward No. 03, Ps- Chausa , Distt- Madhepura , Bihar 2.
Nitu Devi @ Nitu Kumari Wife Of Niranjan Mehta Resident Of VillageFulot , Ward No. 03, Ps- Chausa , Distt- Madhepura , Bihar 3.
Savitri Devi Wife Of Jhago Sharma Resident Of Village- Fulot , Ward No. 03, Ps- Chausa , Distt- Madhepura , Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that they along with other co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant's side, due to land dispute.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30405 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chausa (Fulot O.P.) P.S. Case No.168 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T