Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28456/2025bail granted

Chini Rai @ Jitendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28456 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Chini Rai @ Jitendra Rai Son of Gama Ray Village- jantola ps- Revilganj, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 352 read with Section 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused person are alleged to have abused, assaulted and fired on the informant due to which he sustained gunshot injury on his chest. The co-accused persons along with 20-25 unknown

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28456 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/3 persons also entered the house of the room of Arun Mahto and started assaulting them and due to that Munni Devi became injured. It is further alleged that 14 used cartridges were also recovered from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the injured sustained injury which is simple in nature. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28456 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 3/3

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shivam/- U T