Chunni Mahto @ Sohan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2398 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19739 of 2012 ====================================================== Chunni Mahto @ Sohan Mahto, S/O Late Nageshwar Mahto, VillagePaharpur, P.S.- Jurawanpur, Dist.- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha.

2. Shri Hukum Singh, Mina, the then Director, Land Acquisition and Measurement Deptt., Bihar Govt. Patna.

3. Shri Sanjay Kumar the Then District Magistrate Patna.

4. Shri Prem Singh Mina the then District Magistrate Patna. .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 04-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Advocate General No. 6 for the State. Two show causes have been filed on behalf of the District Magistrate, Patna and the District Magistrate, Vaishali respectively in which steps for demarcation of boundary between Baikathpur (Khushrupur) of Patna District and Raghopur of Vaishali District have been indicated, and it is stated that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by order dated 21.07.2015 passed by the Collector, Patna and order dated 23.07.2015 passed by the Collector, Vaishali. In the aforesaid circumstances, the order dated

Patna High Court MJC No.2398 of 2013 (3) dt.04-08-2015 2/2 16.10.2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 19739 of 2012, under contempt, has already been complied with.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U