← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4591/2014disposed

Binod Kumar Pandit v. The Management Of Punjab National Bank And ORS.

2023-08-08Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4591 of 2014 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1925 of 2012 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Pandit, S/o late Mahendra Kumar Pandit, R/o Mohalla Mohaddi Nagar, Kutub Ganj, P.S.-Mojahidpur, Madea Talab, Mirjanhat, DistrictBhagalpur-1. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Management of Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Biharsharif through its Chief Secretary, namely, Mr. S. S. Sunderam.

2. Mr. S.S. Sunderam, Chief Manage, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda.

3. Mr. Kuldip Sharma, Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Ramchander Pur, Biharsharif.

4. Mr. Munib Kumar, The Senior Branch Mangager, Punjab National Bank, Market Branch, Bhagalpur, D.N. Singh Road, Bhagalpur.

5. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Banking and Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi, namely Dr. Gurdial Singh Sandhur, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 08-08-2023 The present MJC-contempt is filed for noncompliance of the order dated 25.04.2013 passed in LPA No. 1925 of 2012.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is entitled to 8% interest on belated settlement of back-wages which was stated to be paid on 26.03.2015. The same is disputed by learned counsel for the respondents stating that back-wages have been calculated and disbursed on

Patna High Court MJC No.4591 of 2014(5) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 30.04.2013 within the time limit stipulated by this Court vide order dated 25.04.2013 passed in LPA No. 1925 of 2012. The respondents were stated to have preferred Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. (s)-23816/2013 and suffered order on 08.08.2013. In this backdrop, the petitioner is stated to have joined the service on 19.02.2015, thereafter, certain difference of amount has been paid on 26.03.2015.

3. In the light of these dates and events there is a compliance of the order dated 25.04.2013 passed in LPA No. 1925 of 2012 on 30.04.2013 itself. Accordingly, the present proceeding of MJC-contempt stands dropped.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) Vikash/- U