Hridya Nut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30602 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-689 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Hridya Nut Son of Rajnath Nat Resident of Village - Ghoghwaliya, P.S.- Kopa, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 689 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the Bihar Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the informant was returning on his motorcycle with his associate Suraj Kumar, seven persons on three motorcycles surrounded him and on gun point snatched his bracelet and chain of gold.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the F.I.R. was filed against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30602 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 unknown miscreants. This petitioner has given a confessional statement in Garkha P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024 and on the basis of that confessional statement, he has been framed in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Regarding antecedent, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the confessional statement of the petitioner in Garkha P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024, he has been implicated in other cases. No T.I.P. has been conducted. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.01.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Saran, Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 689 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Anushka/- U T