Md. Jahangir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26806 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2018 Thana- KISHUNPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. JAHANGIR Son of Md. Hasim Resident of Village and P.O.- Chainsihpatti, P.S. and District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Anisa Pravin Wife of Md. Jahangir Daughter of Late Md. Hanif, Resident of Village - Tharbitta Punarwas, P.O.- Narhi, P.S.- Kishanpur, District - Supaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amar Nath Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 238 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. On appearance of opposite party No.2 the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre and the report of Mediator at Flag 'M' disclosed that dispute between the parties has been resolved on the basis of terms of settlement agreed between them. It further appears that both the parties undertook to reside together as wife and husband.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant is residing at the house of the petitioner. None appears on behalf of opposite party No.2.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26806 of 2019(5) dt.23-10-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 238 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition that he has to obey the terms and conditions as per agreement mutually reached between them before Mediation. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

Let a copy of the report of Mediator along with the memorandum of agreement be sent to the court below for needful. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T