Harendra Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57757 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2017 Thana -SISWAN District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Harendra Singh, S/o Late Kapildeo Singh,

2. Sushil Kumar Singh @ Chunchun Singh S/o Gauri Shankar Singh,

3. Shambhu Singh @ Shambhu Nath Singh S/o Late Kapildeo Singh,

4. Chandan Kumari D/o Harendra Singh,

5. Saroj Devi W/o Shambhu Singh,

6. Nirmala Devi W/o Gauri Shankar Singh, All R/o Village- Karsaut, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Samir Kumar Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case instituted under Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57757 of 2017 (2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is cousin brother-in-law, petitioner no.3 is cousin father-in-law, petitioner no.4 is Nanad, petitioner no.5 and petitioner no.6 are cousin mother-in-law of the victim. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The petitioners have further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and counsel for the O.P. No.2, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No.93/2017 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T