← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31001/2022bail granted

Sinoj Singh @ Sinoj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-10Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31001 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-582 Year-2020 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur ====================================================== SINOJ SINGH @ SINOJ KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAMJIT SINGH R/OVILLAGE GHOR POKHAR, P.S.- UDWANT NAGAR, DIST.- BHOJPUR (ARRAH) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Vardhan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 582(c) of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 379, 504, 498 (A), 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. As per allegation, the marriage of complainant was solemnized with the petitioner in July, 2017. The accused persons subjected the complainant to cruelty for non-fulfillment of dowry. Lastly she was ousted from her matrimonial house. The accused persons threatened to kill her, had their demand remained unfulfilled.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31001 of 2022(3) dt.10-01-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation is false. The petitioner is innocent. He never committed atrocities upon the complainant. As a matter of fact, she herself left the house of the petitioner after leaving her child with the petitioner. In order to explore the possibility of resolution of the dispute amicably, the notice was sent to the complainant through both processes. The service report shows that she refused to receive the notice.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur (Ara) in connection with Complaint Case No. 582 (c) of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T