← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29547/2022bail granted

Sujit Kumar @ Sujeet Yadav @ Sujit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-14Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29547 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2021 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

SUJIT KUMAR @ SUJEET YADAV @ SUJIT YADAV RAMPUKAR YADAV R/O- VILL- AURE ,WARD NO.- 13, P.S.- CHERIA BARIYARPUR, DIST.- BEGUSARAI 2.

BABU SAHEB YADAV @ BABU SAHEB KUMAR SON OF KAILASH YADAV R/O- VILL- AURE ,WARD NO.- 13, P.S.- CHERIA BARIYARPUR, DIST.- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307, 379, 354(B), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are young boys of 24 and 18 years of age and the informant alleges that the accused persons, including the petitioners, armed with deadly weapons came to her house asking about the whereabouts of her grand-son and threatened to kill him or would commit gang rape

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29547 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/3 of the informant, it is next alleged that accused persons thereafter threw the informant on the ground and disrobed her, thereafter Deepak is alleged to have assaulted her with farsa on head causing injury and the accused persons, including the petitioners, assaulted her son causing injury. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that no reason or motive has been assigned for the occurrence, it is also submitted that even injury is suffered by the injured is simple in nature. It is next submitted that petitioners are young boys and, in the event, if they are sent to jail their entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that they may come in contact with hardened criminals. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29547 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 251 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T